Tuesday, May 11, 2010

Press Release: John Cornwell’s analysis of Newman’s miracle is seriously flawed

Domenica scorsa il Times di Londra ha pubblicato un articolo di John Cornwell, autore di un libro di prossima uscita nel quale si mette in discussione il processo di beatificazione di Newman. Questa è la risposta ufficiale dell'Oratorio di Birmingham

John Cornwell’s attack on Cardinal Newman’s miraculous healing of Deacon Jack Sullivan (‘Why Newman is no saint’ The Sunday Times May 9) is seriously flawed.

Cornwell wants to show that Sullivan’s healing was not miraculous, but medically explicable because of the surgical treatment Sullivan received. To this end, Cornwell assembles experts who testify that such surgery is generally successful, and that improvements in Sullivan’s underlying condition can flow from purely natural influences. Cornwell’s arguments, however, are very misleading.

Sullivan’s healing consisted in instantaneous, complete and lasting freedom from debilitating pain and immobility, following a prayer to Cardinal Newman on August 15 2001, six days after his operation. Nothing in the expert testimonies adduced by Cornwell show that such a recovery, in such a time period, can be attributed to surgery, or natural causes in general.

Cornwell also suggests that the Congregation for the Causes of Saints and Pope Benedict XVI conspired to suppress the truth about Sullivan’s healing to portray it as medically inexplicable. The suggestion is absurd. The Church’s procedures have been faithfully adhered to and everything is in the public domain.

An article appearing towards the end of this week will demonstrate in detail the failings of Cornwell’s arguments.

Cornwell makes clear that his agenda is discrediting Pope Benedict XVI and Papal teaching, to promote a ‘progressive’ view of Cardinal Newman as a ‘dissident’, above all concerning individual conscience in relation to the teaching of the Catholic Church in Faith and Morals. The Pope however is the leading authentic interpreter of Newman’s teaching on conscience, which Cornwell and other ‘progressive’ Catholics misunderstand and misrepresent.

Readers of Cornwell’s article should be aware that his attack on the Newman miracle is not only unfounded, but another attempt to recruit Newman to the factional cause of ‘liberal’ Catholicism. Newman’s doctrine of conscience, in fact his life-long contribution to Christianity as both an Anglican and a Catholic, are in opposition to the rejection of authority in Faith and Morals which ‘liberal’ Catholics are determined to promote.

The Birmingham Oratory

11 May 2010

To read about the process of Beatification please click here.

For Press Enquiries please see click here.

To sign up for regular updates from the Cause please click here.


  1. John Cornwell si inserisce a pieno titolo nella canea urlante che ce l'ha col Papa, con la Chiesa, coi cattolici, con...
    C'è ancora chi gli dà retta, però.
    Andiamo avanti, seguendo quello che in questi giorni ci dice il Santo Padre, che mi sembra più importante.

  2. Un ringraziamento all'Uomo Vivo, sia per il commento che per la segnalazione sul suo blog.